Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
Strategic importance to, and expectation of strong support from, parent ABCL
ABSLI is strategically important to ABCL from which it derives significant managerial, funding and branding support. This is reflected in representation of the directors of the parent on the company’s board (also, both ABSLI and ABCL have the same chairman) and high involvement of the parent in ABSLI’s functioning. At the time of its inception, ABSLI received Rs 967 crore as capital from ABCL and since then, the company’s networth has been supported by its internal accretions. At 51.0%, parent is expected to retain majority stake in the company. Strategic importance to ABCL is underpinned by the established market position of ABSLI among private sector life insurance companies and expectation of gradual improvement in market share and overall profitability over the medium term. Furthermore, being the life insurance arm of the parent, the company sells a variety of customised policies to the clients of ABCL and the ABG, which makes it a key element of the latter's bouquet of financial service offerings.
Adequate capitalisation and sufficient cushion in solvency over regulatory minimum
Capitalisation has been adequate in relation to the nature and scale of business. On March 31, 2022, net worth was Rs 2502 crore (excluding the balance in fair value change account) which, apart from the financial support from parent companies, has been backed by the internal accrual of the company.
Average solvency ratio has been over 1.9 times over the last 6-8 fiscals and is likely to be above 1.70 times on a steady state basis, which aligns with the stance of ABCL. On March 31, 2022, ABSLI had a solvency ratio of 1.88 times, which includes the subordinated debt that was issued by the company last year.
Considering that the current product portfolio of the company is focused on the traditional term products where the policyholders’ risks are limited, the quantum of capital required and maintained by ABSLI has been higher. However, as it migrates towards a more balanced product mix across ULIPs (unit-linked insurance plans) and traditional products, capital requirement is not expected to increase materially alongside growth. Even in a stress case scenario comprising concurrent shocks to both equity prices and bond yields, the solvency ratio is expected to stay above the minimum level of 150%.
Established market position in the Indian Life Insurance Sector as the eighth largest private player, ability to grow at par with peers remains a monitorable.
Since its inception in fiscal 2000, ABSLI has been among the top 10 life insurers in the country. Until fiscal 2016, the company had a market share of about 1.8% which made it the fifth-largest private life insurer in the country. However, for the following years until fiscal 2020, growth was subdued.
In terms of business strategy, the company started migrating from a highly ULIP-focused book in 2016 to traditional products. The revised product strategy comprising over 40% share of non-par segment took 2-3 years to stabilize when the company’s growth remained muted at 3-7%, against an industry growth of 10-14% over the same period. Upon attaining stability, the company grew at a robust 27% in fiscal 2019. However, this momentum was disrupted by the pandemic in fiscal 2020 when the annual growth in premium declined to 7%. Thereafter, driven by favorable demand prospects and revision in pricing of term products, the company’s gross premiums grew by 22% and 24% for fiscal 2021 and 2022, respectively. Basis its market share of 2.8% in terms of annual premium equivalent (APE) and 1.8% for new business premium, at gross premium level ABSLI was the eighth-largest private life insurer for fiscal 2022.
Sound investment portfolio supported by stringent regulations
The company follows a strict investment policy, in addition to the regulations prescribed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority. As on March 31, 2022, 37.8% of the total investments was in G-Secs (majorly in Central G-Secs). Of the debt securities, 99% were rated AA and above. The company has made provisions for the sub-standard and non-performing assets on its books and does not anticipate any further material provisioning requirement as of now. Equity investments form less than 26% of the investment book and are mostly in blue chips.
Weakness:
High reliance on direct sourcing channel as an avenue for sourcing business
While ABSLI has been attempting to diversify its distribution base, it still relies majorly on the proprietary channel (direct and individual agency) that contributed 68% to the total new business premium (individual and group) during nine months ended December 31, 2021. Of this, the share of new business premium sourced from individual agency channel was 16% whereas contribution from direct channel stood at 52% for nine months ended December 31, 2021. The share of proprietary channel in the total premium, however, has declined gradually from 92.0% in fiscal 2016. Bancassurance, from 3% in fiscal 2016, has emerged to become the second largest contributor of new business premium (individual and group) written during nine months ended December 31, 2021 with 25% share. As the company continues to strengthen its bancassurance channel, the share of business from this avenue is expected to grow and will lead to economies of scale.
Moderate profitability metrics
Operating expenses, though improving, have been higher than most peers owing to greater dependence on direct distribution channel for sourcing business. Another factor to higher operating expenses is a relatively lower share of renewal premium in the total premium earned during any fiscal. For new business premium, operating expense ratio of the company has remained within 27-35%, whereas for overall premiums the ratio has been 13-16% in the last 3-4 fiscals. Resultantly, earnings profile has been modest. With shift of focus from ULIPs to traditional products fiscal 2016 onwards, investment income from ULIPs – which contributed significantly to the overall accrual – also declined sharply and has remained low since. There has been revival fiscal 2021 onwards, but the ability of the company to sustain income from investments at this level remains to be seen. Apart from investment income, net premium income was also almost static over the last few fiscals given the revision in business strategy. However, with stablisation – the net premium income has also increased over fiscal 2021 and 2022. Pre-tax returns (on average total assets) have remained around 0.3% and returns on networth, below 10% for the last three fiscals. However, Gross Value of New Business (VNB) margins have been comfortable at about 35% to 40%, indicating greater potential of new business written. For fiscal 2022, In anticipation of rise in term product prices, ability to improve returns alongside growth and competition remains key.
Ability to sustain competitive position and profitability amidst changing regulatory environment and growing competition remains to be seen
The regulatory changes in unit-linked products in 2010 and traditional products in 2013, though beneficial, had a far-reaching impact on the product design, marketing strategy, and profitability of all the players, including ABSLI. Moreover, with the entry of many new players over the past decade, competition has increased multifold. Top 2-3 players have had the early mover advantage and captured a larger market share whereas others are continuously focusing on innovating products and increasing persistency to get a better market share. Ability to generate adequate profits while growing in sync with the industry in the long term will be a key monitorable.