Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Adequate capitalisation with track-record of raising capital from marquee investors
The capital position of Capital Float is adequate for the current scale of operations. It has a demonstrated track record of raising capital from marquee investors such as Ribbit Capital, Elevation Capital, Amazon, Sequoia Capital, Creation Investments and Aspada Investments. Since inception, it has raised a total capital of about Rs 795.0 crore out of which Rs 37.1 crore was raised in fiscal 2021, Rs 72.7 crore in fiscal 2020, Rs 124.3 crore in fiscal 2019, Rs 292.5 crore in fiscal 2018, Rs 170.0 crore in fiscal 2017 and Rs 97.9 crore in fiscal 2015. Further, the company is in the process of raising further capital of Rs 300 crore, which is expected to be completed by fiscal 2022.
At a consolidated level, Capital Float had adequate capitalization with reported networth of Rs 428.6 crore and adjusted gearing[2] of 2.2 as on March 31, 2020. On a steady-state basis, adjusted gearing is expected to remain below 3 times. Capitalisation should continue to be adequate over the medium term, supported by proposed capital raise and improvement in profitability, thus providing a cushion against asset-side risks.
- Competent management team, that benefits from the experience and involvement of Board members
Capital Float was started by co-founders in 2013 and an experienced management team, which had worked in the lending business for most of their career of 15-20 years, was also brought in -- the team has experience across risk, credit, technology and operations.
With this, the company was able to set up the business and diversify its product offerings in the SME segment and eventually in the consumer finance segment as well.
The company also benefits from the experience of its investors. Capital Float has eight board members, four of whom have been nominated by key investors. They provide guidance and support through connect with global peers, bringing in partnerships, establishing best practices and enhancing governance standards. All of this should stand the company in good stead as it scales up business hereon.
Weaknesses:
- Weak asset quality and profitability
Capital Float has weak profitability, reporting, at a consolidated level, a loss of Rs 184.9 crore on total income of Rs 345.5 crore in fiscal 2020 as against a loss of Rs 160.0 crore on a total income of Rs 228.0 crore in fiscal 2019. This was primarily because of weak asset quality, leading to high credit costs, as well as high operating expenses.
Capital Float commenced operations in 2014 with the unsecured SME finance segment. From 2014 to 2018, the company offered a wide range of products to underserved segments, mainly to SME. It was primarily offering SME loans with a ticket size of Rs 25-30 lakh. The sourcing of loans was mainly through direct sales agents, which led to high customer acquisition costs. Over the years, Capital Float diversified into multiple products.
Given modest credit risk profile of a large proportion of its borrowers, significant competition, product-specific challenges and external macro-economic events such as demonetization, roll out of the Goods and Services Tax, ban of liquor on highways, the company faced asset quality challenges leading to high credit costs. Further, reliance on external agencies on collections led to sub-optimal recovery levels. Its 90+ dpd (including write-off of last 12 months) increased to 4.1% (Rs 47 crore) as of March 2018. Further, owing to challenges in the legacy book and degrowth in AUM, it further increased to 16.3% (Rs 168 crore) as of March 2020 and 19.6% (Rs 163 crore) as of September 2020. Operating expenses were also high at 13.5% of average managed assets for fiscal 2020 and 13.0% for fiscal 2019.
Based on the experience gained during 2014 to 2018, the company took corrective actions. It took a strategic call to slow down disbursements. It stopped all the products, wherein it faced challenges, tightened its underwriting, risk management process and improved collections infrastructure. In SME finance, the company, reduced the ticket size to about 10 lakh in 2019 and then to Rs 3-4 lakh now. The same also led to lower competition and better risk-adjusted pricing, along with improving the control mechanism with Capital Float being the first or second lender. The company also diversified into consumer finance with partnership with Amazon for online checkout finance and acquired Walnut, wherein it offers personal line of credit. With increase in focus towards consumer finance, the company has moved from SME finance being 100% of the AUM as on Mar-16 to about 60% as on Mar-20. Further, interest rates of about 22-24% on consumer finance products should support risk-adjusted returns to the company.
As it was strengthening its processes, degrowth in AUM affected the unit economics and pre-provisioning profits of the company, which averaged a negative 4.8% of managed assets for fiscal 2020 as against a negative 3.5% for fiscal 2019. Further, it updated its write-off policy and wrote-off accounts over 180 dpd level from the legacy book underwritten prior to 2018. Credit costs increased to 6.8% of average managed assets for fiscal 2020 as against 6.8% for fiscal 2019 and 3.6% for fiscal 2018.
However, with key products being identified, AUM is expected to grow from current levels, which will bring in operational efficiencies supporting the pre-provisioning profits of the company. Further, improvement in underwriting and risk management is expected to lower credit costs.
However, most of the products are relatively new and the ability to scale these up with improvement in asset quality and profitability needs to be demonstrated.