Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Adequate capital position, supported by a diverse investor base
The bank’s capital position was adequate despite seasonal volatility in asset quality owing to socio-political issues. In fiscal 2020, the bank raised Rs 95 crore by issuance of rights to existing shareholders. This, in addition to a stable cash accrual, resulted in networth of Rs 1,017 crore as on March 31, 2021, and tier I CAR of 24.9%. On a steady state basis, the bank intends to maintain its tier I CAR at 20%. Gearing was moderate at 6.7 times as on March 31, 2021, and is expected at less than 6 times over the medium term.
In addition, CRISIL Ratings believes that Fincare SFB enjoys strong flexibility to raise equity, whenever required, given the diverse group of investors with high pedigree; some of whom have been associated with the entity since 2010.
- Experienced board and senior management team
Fincare SFB benefits substantially from the presence of experienced professionals from across the financial sector. The transition from being just a promoter-driven entity to an entity managed by a team of experienced professionals happened almost a decade ago. The senior management team is highly experienced. Leadership team, including Mr Rajeev Yadav, Mr Keyur Doshi, Mr Soham Shukla and Mr Mahendar Chawla, has been stable for many years now. Other top executives, such as Mr Pankaj Gulati, Mr Chandar Rao and Mr Kishore Mangalvedhe, have also been with the entity for over 5 years.
The board, chaired by Mr Pramod Kabra, a partner with True North, comprises eminent persons from the financial and allied sectors. They have rich domain expertise and extensive experience in the fields of microfinance and self-help groups, audit and accounts, taxation, technology and strategy.
- Adequate risk management systems and practices, bolstered by digital initiatives undertaken by the bank
Over its operational history, previously as an MFI and now as a bank, Fincare SFB has been able to acclimatise its systems and processes according to its scale and nature of business while keeping technology in the forefront. This enabled the scaling-up of the operationally intensive microfinance business and remains an anchor for the bank’s retail portfolio. Adequate audit and internal control mechanisms have been put in place, which include a separate operational risk function. Ever since Disha Microfin and Future Financial Services have been amalgamated, the board and senior management team have taken multiple initiatives to increase the digital orientation of operations. As part of its long-term strategy, the bank has launched ‘101 first account’, a zero balance digital savings account with instant account opening feature. ‘Kaizala’ a secure employee communication and productivity application has digitised field processes such as password resets, audits, UPI collection, and branch controls, providing greater visibility on the activities of the field staff. The bank has already implemented its DLite and M-Care process flows, which involve tablet-based loan application followed by real-time credit bureau check and instant credit decision.
- Increasing deposit base, driven by increasing share of retail deposits
Deposit base stood at Rs 5,318 crore as on March 31, 2021, driven by growth in compound annual terms of 61%, constituting 79% of the total external liabilities. This growth was coupled with an increasing share of retail deposits in the overall liability franchise, anchored by the bank’s ability to leverage its existing base of over 2.5 million retail borrowers on the asset side, of which majority are now deposit customers as well. The share of retail deposits (CASA and term deposits of less than Rs 2 crore) in the total deposit base (including CDs) has increased from 73.6% on March 31, 2019, to 87.6% and is expected to grow further.
While the traction in retail deposits imparts granularity to liabilities, CASA share rose to 23.7% of total deposits and 18.8% of total borrowings as on March 31, 2021, from 11.9% and 9.3%, respectively, in the previous fiscal. The CASA share is comparable with other SFBs but lower than other universal banks. Ability to sustain growth in retail deposits and increase the share of CASA in the overall deposit and liability base remains a key monitorable.
Weaknesses:
- Cost of funds and CASA weaker than that for banks
Despite good traction in retail deposits over the past few quarters, the proportion of CASA in the total deposit and borrowing base remains low. While the share of CASA in the total deposit base increased to 23.7% in fiscal 2021 from 11.9% in fiscal 2020, it is lower than that of universal banks. As a proportion of total borrowings, CASA was even lower at 18.8% compared with the banking industry average of 30%. On the other hand, cost of funds was higher than the 5-6% of other mid-sized banks. While this metric has improved gradually since Fincare SFB transitioned into a bank, as incremental funds being in the form of low cost deposits and refinance from financial institutions. For fiscal 2017, cost of funds was above 10%, which declined to 8.6% in 2021 and is expected to reduce further.
- Modest credit risk profiles of the borrowers
A significant 79% of the portfolio comprises microfinance loans to clients with average credit risk profiles and lack of access to formal credit. These customers belong to the semi-skilled, self-employed category, and their income may be volatile and dependent on the local economy. With the slowdown in economic activity after the lockdown, the potential pressure on borrowers’ cash flows may restrict their repayment capability. Moreover, this segment of borrowers continues to be subjected to idiosyncratic risks on account of socio-political factors. With slowdown in economic activity owing to the second wave of the pandemic, the cash flow for such borrowers has been stretched, thereby restricting the repayment capability. The bank is in a process of identifying the more impacted customers due to the second wave of Covid 19 from this segment and restructured their loans in the coming months.
As revival to pre-Covid levels has been prolonged, the ability of Fincare SFB to reinstate repayment discipline among its customers will be a monitorable.
- Limited seasoning of the non-microfinance portfolio
In the non-microfinance segment, which forms the remaining 21% of the bank’s AUM, Fincare SFB’s track record is limited with vintage of just over two years in affordable housing loans, loan against property, loan against gold and institutional finance. Other products such as two-wheeler loans have been introduced even more recently in fiscal 2019. Loan against property and gold loans form the bulk of the non-microfinance portfolio, and stood at 11% and 6% of the AUM, respectively, as of May 2021. However, asset quality in these segments has weakened, as reflected in 90+ dpd of 9.6% and 8.8%, respectively, as on May 31, 2021. In the long term, the bank’s ability to profitably scale its non-microfinance portfolio while maintaining sound asset quality will be a key rating sensitivity factor.