Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Expectation of continued support from FFH till the transaction is completed
Till the transaction is completed, the ratings will continue to factor in expectation of strong support from FFH, a step down subsidiary of Temasek (rated ‘AAA/Stable’ by S&P Global). FFH has senior level representation on the Board and various committees of FICCL, and is involved in key decisions taken by the company. Currently, FICCL’s compliance, finance, treasury, business and risk management functions are aligned with the global standards of FFH.
FFH has demonstrated its commitment towards FICCL during stressed times. From 2007 till date, FFH has infused over Rs 2,700 crore with over Rs 600 crore being infused in 2009-2010 during the then stressed environment. More importantly, even last year in April 2020 at the start of the pandemic, Rs 750 crores of equity capital was infused as a confidence capital and to also ensure adequate capital buffers.
The shared brand will also continue during this period which also enhances the expectation of support from FFH, if needed. Any material disruption in FICCL business could, in CRISIL’s view, have a significant impact on the reputation and franchise of the parent.
CRISIL Ratings will track the progress on the transaction and have discussions with SMFG’s management to understand their strategy and business plan for India. The plans around change in the company name to reflect association with SMFG and Board representation will also be a critical factor.
On standalone basis, FICCL reported a drop in networth to Rs 4,244 crore as on March 31, 2021 from Rs 4,648 crore a year ago. This was largely due to significantly high provisioning for non-performing assets (Gross NPA) as well as restructured accounts which resulted in a loss of Rs 1,157 crore for fiscal 2021. However, the equity capital infusion of Rs 750 crore in April 2020 provided some support. Similarly on consolidated basis too, the networth was lower at Rs 4,132 crore (Previous year of Rs 4,592 crore). The company was cautious on disbursements during fiscal 2021 and hence the overall assets under management (AUM) at FICCL reduced by around 16% during the year. Consequently, with lower borrowing requirement for business, the adjusted gearing[1] was adequate at 4.5 times (standalone) and 5.8 times (consolidated) as on March 31, 2021. In terms of capital adequacy ratio (CAR), as on March 31, 2021, FICCL’s overall CAR stood at 19.8% with tier 1 CAR at 14.8%. Similarly, FIHFCL reported tier I and overall capital adequacy ratios of 21.3% and 24.3%, respectively, as on March 31, 2021 well above the regulatory requirement.
FICCL had so far followed a conservative capitalisation policy. It maintained a buffer over the regulatory capital requirement; the buffer is based on a stress test conducted in line with FFH policies. With the expected change in parentage, the policy around capital profile to be followed by SMFG will be a key monitorable.
- Strong liquidity management
Liquidity management policy is strong with FICCL needing to maintain cash and liquid investments to the extent of at least one month of outflows at all points in time. However, in practise the company maintains in excess of policy. Including fee-paying committed and undrawn CC/WCDL lines, this increases further to 4-6 months of outflows. This liquidity cushion is higher during periods of stress as can be seen now during the pandemic period as the group is having liquidity cover for over 6 months of debt repayment outflows as on June 30, 2021. This was also visible during demonetisation period. In addition, the diversified lender base, low reliance on short term funding (commercial paper) and well-matched asset-liability to minimise tenor and refinancing risks provide support. FICCL has also raised foreign currency loans and foreign currency bonds in fiscal 2020, thereby diversifying its funding profile further. Additionally, even during the past one year, the company continued to raise funds at optimal costs. The group is thus likely to be well-placed to withstand any liquidity pressure in the market. Nevertheless, with the expected change in parentage, the policy around liquidity buffers to be followed by SMFG will be a key monitorable
Weaknesses:
- Weak asset quality due to impact of pandemic
At consolidated level, as on March 31, 2021, AUM stood at Rs 25,049 crore, of which around 48% comprised unsecured loans (mainly personal loans including rural group loans), which are vulnerable to economic cycles. The group has managed these segments in the past as reflected during demonetisation too wherein the management was able to enforce corrective actions and report upgrades and recoveries. However, during fiscal 2021, the pandemic-induced challenges, localised lockdowns and associated impact on cash flows of borrowers resulted in deterioration in asset quality. FICCL on standalone basis reported GNPA of 9.6% as on March 31, 2021 (2.1% as on March 31, 2020) while FIHFCL reported GNPA of 5.6% as on March 31, 2021 (3.8% as on March 31, 2020). CRISIL Ratings notes that the FICCL and FIHFCL have also implemented resolution plan for COVID related stress under RBI framework dated 6th August, 2020 and normal restructuring of around 9.4% and 2.8% of their loan book. Of the same, more than 50% of the accounts have been classified as NPA / Stage 3 assets. Hence, the overall stressed assets (GNPA + residual restructuring) is around 12.8%. Additionally, CRISIL notes that the group also has aggressive write-off policies. During fiscal 2021, the FICCL’s write-off as proportion of AUM was at 7.0% of loan book (4.0% during fiscal 2020).
Over the years, risk management processes and data analytics capability have been strengthened. Underwriting norms and monitoring mechanisms have been reinforced. The unsecured lending business has also been supported through investments in risk analytics and technology. Underwriting and collection norms have been tightened based on portfolio performance trends and early warning indicators. While the pandemic related challenges were unprecedented, the company is putting in renewed efforts to recover from delinquent accounts.
The months of April and May 2021 again brought forth risks to asset quality due to the second Covid-19 wave. The company’s ability to manage collections and asset quality metrics will be a key monitorable.
- Profitability impacted due to high ECL provisioning and write-offs on account of pandemic
Historically, earnings profile was supported by a large proportion of high-yield businesses and competitive borrowing costs. This helped FICCL report high net interest margin and pre-provisioning profits over the past 5 years till fiscal 2020. Hence, despite credit costs being in the range of 1.8% to 4.0% over the same period, the return on total managed assets (RoMA) of FICCL on standalone basis was healthy at 1.6% to 3.7% over the past 5 years. However, during fiscal 2021, FICCL reported a loss of Rs 1157 crore. This was due to high write-offs and aggressive expected credit loss provisioning across stages on account of pandemic. FICCL’s write-off as proportion of AUM was at 7.0% of loan book (4.0% during fiscal 2020). More importantly, the company’s ECL stage 3 provisioning was at 77% and stage 2 provisioning too was at around 55%. The company also recognised more than 50% of restructured accounts as part of stage 3 assets. For overall restructured assets too, FICCL has provided for more than 76% of the restructured loan book. Consequently, the overall credit costs stood at around 12% of loan book. CRISIL Ratings notes that there was also a decrease in interest income due to deterioration on credit profile of portfolio.
Similarly, FIHFCL’s ECL stage 3 provisioning was at 53% and even for restructured accounts (recognised as stage 2), the total provisioning cover was at 41%. Consequently, FIHFCL too reported loss of Rs 55.5 crore in fiscal 2021.
While the provisioning cover is high, the company is putting in renewed efforts to recover from delinquent accounts. With such high cover, CRISIL Ratings believes that the company could benefit from recoveries due to roll-backs or enforcement of security during fiscal 2022.