Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
* Adequate capitalisation, supported by regular equity infusion and rich pedigree of investors
Over the last few years, the company has on-boarded investors such as Warburg Pincus and Creation Investments, capital support from whom has strengthened Fusion’s capital position significantly. The capital position, reflected in adjusted networth (provisional) of Rs 1,239 crore as on December 31, 2020, is adequate in relation to the current scale of operations. Between April 01, 2016, and December 31, 2020, the company raised Rs 1,033 crore, which is demonstrative of the constant support from investors and Fusion’s ability to attract new investors. Warburg Pincus (via Honey Rose Investment Ltd), which became the largest shareholder in the company after infusing Rs 300 crore in December 2018, has further infused Rs 500 crore along with Creation Investments in the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Other key investors, apart from the promoter, – Mr Devesh Sachdev, are Oikocredit and Global Financial Inclusion Fund. Though adjusted gearing has been on a relatively higher side, post equity infusion by Warburg Pincus in fiscals 2019 and 2020, adjusted gearing moderated to 3.4 times as on December 31, 2020. With a rich pedigree of investors and demonstrated capital support received from them, capitalisation metrics are expected to remain comfortable -- despite the potential rise in credit losses due to the Covid-19 pandemic-led disruption -- in the near future.
The company’s ability to ramp up internal accretion so that it is able to self-sustain its capital position and, thereby, keep gearing within the targeted cap of 5 times remains a monitorable. Nevertheless, going by the past track record, Fusion has been able to raise the required equity capital and ensure that overall capital position remains adequate. This would also substantiate maintenance of adjusted gearing at around 5 times and an overall capital adequacy ratio of 20% on a steady-state basis.
* Sound risk management practices
Fusion has developed adequate risk management systems and practices over the last few years as it expands operations to new markets. This enabled the company to maintain its asset quality performance in existing regions; it also assists in the identification of newer regions. The company evaluates the potential area of operations on Area Lucrative Index, which involves assessment of parameters denoting the credit potential of the region. The company also has an extensive audit team of over 200 members, with the number of branches being capped at two per auditor. The branches are graded twice a month on over 100 parameters, which helps the company detect any ongoing or potential issues.
AUM was Rs 3,607 crore as of March 2020, registering an on-year growth of 36%. However, owing to lower disbursement and lockdown in various regions due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the growth momentum was curbed in the first half of fiscal 2021. Eventually, as business activity picked up during the second half of fiscal 2021, AUM increased to Rs 4,637 crore (provisional) as on March 31, 2021, registering an on-year growth of 28.5%.
In terms of geographic diversity, the company has expanded its presence to 18 states, with highest exposure to a single state being 18% and the top five states being 66% as against 33% and 94%, respectively, prior to demonetisation as on March 31, 2016. Alongside expansion in geographical presence, the robust growth encountered over the last few years is supported by adequate monitoring of operational parameters, such as calibrated increase in ticket size and AUM exposure per branch, per district and so on.
However, considering the rapid growth in loan portfolio, significant expansion into new geographies and limited loan cycle vintage, Fusion’s ability to sustain its risk management processes and demonstrate strong asset quality performance in new markets remains a key monitorable.
* Experienced senior management team
Fusion is promoted by Mr Devesh Sachdev, who is an alumnus of Xavier School of Management, with over two decades of experience before he started Fusion in 2010. The second line of management comprises professionals with an average experience of over a decade in the fields of commercial and retail lending, audit, operations, people management and IT. The board has adequate representation from investors and extends strategic support to the company.
Weakness:
* Ability to maintain asset quality performance and control credit losses in the near term remains a monitorable
In fiscal 2017, asset quality witnessed a sharp deterioration in the aftermath of demonetisation due to socio-political issues in North Uttar Pradesh and adjoining regions of Madhya Pradesh. Portfolio delinquencies - that is, 90+ dpd and 30+ dpd—were significantly impacted and stood at 12.1% and 23.1%, respectively, as on March 31, 2017. However, the delinquencies considerably improved to 3.6% and 3.9%, respectively, as on March 31, 2018, due to: focused efforts of the management to improve recovery and writing-off bad loans with limited recovery prospects. Fusion wrote off Rs 95.5 crore over the next two years post demonetisation, which was nearly 12.4% of the AUM at the time of demonetisation. However, the company continues to make dedicated efforts of recovery from accounts, which have been written off.
Post the moratorium period, 30+ dpd rose to 11.4% as on December 31, 2020. Overall profitability for the nine months ended December 31, 2020, was also impacted by higher pandemic-related provisioning requirement, evidenced by a decline in return on managed assets (RoMA) to 0.9% from 1.7% in fiscal 2020. As the situation around severity and longevity of Covid-19 impact evolves, sustainability of asset quality in the near-to-medium term will be monitored closely. Besides, with the risk of potential increase in credit losses in the near-to-medium term, profitability will remain closely monitored.
* Inherently modest credit profile of borrowers
A significant portion of the portfolio comprises microfinance loans to clients with below-average credit risk profiles and lack of access to formal credit. Typical borrowers are cattle owners, vegetable vendors, tailors, tea shops, provision stores and small fabrication units. The income flow of these households could be volatile and dependent on the local economy. With the slowdown in economic activity due to the ongoing pandemic, there could be potential pressure on such borrowers’ cash flows at a household level, thereby restricting their repayment capability. Fusion's collection efficiency revived by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and has been steadily improving since then. It stood at over 100% in March 2021 owing to higher overdue collection, while the current collection stood at 87%. However, with sharp spike in number of cases due to second wave of the pandemic and various lockdown being imposed by the states to curb the spread of Covid-19, the ability to reinstate repayment discipline among its customers such that pre-pandemic levels of periodic collections are achieved, will be a key monitorable
* Potential risk from local socio-political issues in the microfinance sector
The microfinance sector has witnessed two major disruptive events in the past decade. The first was the crisis promulgated by the ordinance passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in 2010 and the second was demonetisation in 2016. In addition, the sector has faced issues of varying intensity in several geographies. Promulgation of the ordinance on microfinance institutions (MFIs) by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in 2010 demonstrated their vulnerability to regulatory and legislative risks. The ordinance triggered a chain of events that adversely affected the business models of MFIs by impairing their growth, asset quality, profitability and solvency. Similarly, the sector witnessed high level of delinquencies post-demonetisation and the subsequent socio-political events. For Fusion, the ultimate credit loss due to disruption after demonetisation was close to 12.4%, which was borne over the following two fiscals. This indicates the fragility of the business model vis-a-vis external risks. As the business involves lending to the poor and downtrodden sections of the society, MFIs will remain exposed to socially sensitive factors, including charging of high interest rates and consequently, to tighter regulations and legislation.