Strengths: * Established market position in the housing finance space The assets under management (AUM) for PNB Housing has grown at a CAGR of around 45% from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2019 reaching Rs 84,722 crores as on March 31, 2019. This has been driven by growth across both retail segments as well as the wholesale portfolio, albeit pace of growth in the latter has been higher on account of the low base. Consequently, share of individual housing loans to the AUM has dropped to 58% as on March 31, 2019 compared to 64% as on March 31, 2014, while share of the wholesale portfolio (including lease rental discounting) increased to 21% from 11% during the same period. As on March 31, 2019, the AUM comprised of housing loans (58%), construction finance (13%), loan against property (LAP; 17%), lease rental discounting (LRD; 4%), non-residential property loan (NRPL; 4%), and corporate term loan (CTL; 4%). In terms of portfolio it is well diversified across India; with western, northern and southern India contributing 38%, 32% and 30%, respectively, as on March 31, 2019. However, amidst the current environment, with caution around the wholesale portfolio, the company intends to reduce the share of the same going forward and is taking steps towards this direction. * Well-diversified resource profile PNB Housing has maintained a healthy resource profile with better-than-peer cost of borrowings on account of its long-standing relationships with multilateral agencies (IFC and ADB), mutual funds, banks, insurance companies, provident funds, corporates and pension funds. The company has a diversified funding profile, with an adequate mix of retail and wholesale borrowings. A significant proportion of its funding is long-term to match the long tenure of its loan portfolio. Company has increased its focus on raising fixed deposits after December 2011; the share of fixed deposits in total borrowings stood at around 17% as on March 31, 2019. While the share of fixed deposits had earlier reduced from 27% as on March 31, 2016, this was due to a conscious decision by the company given the relatively higher cost of deposits. With the funding environment remaining challenging, PNB Housing now intends to focus on resource diversification and tapping the fixed deposits option. On a steady state basis, the share of granular fixed deposits to overall borrowings is expected to be around 23-25%. Adding to the diversity in its resource profile, company has adequate proportion of capital market funding, with bonds and non-convertible debentures comprising 28% of total borrowings. Other funding sources include banks borrowings (18%), refinance from NHB (8%), commercial paper (10%), and external commercial borrowings (6%) and securitization (13%). Even amidst the current environment, with lenders exercising caution in increasing exposures, PNB Housing has managed to raise over Rs 38,000 crores since September 2018 till June 30, 2019; 77% of which was in the form of bank loans and other long term borrowings such as non-convertible debenture, refinance from NHB and external commercial borrowings. However, borrowing costs have risen for PNB Housing as seen for many other non-banks as well. Nevertheless, the increase has been moderate with the company's borrowing cost (based on yearly average) reaching around 8.2% for fiscal 2019 compared to 7.9% for the previous fiscal. * Brand-sharing benefits from the parentage of PNB PNB Housing continues to benefit from branding support from its parent, PNB (33% ownership currently). While the latter's stake has reduced from 51% following the IPO and the stake sale in November 2017, CRISIL believes PNB will remain amongst the largest shareholders of PNB Housing in the near term. PNB Housing is being managed by an independent management team, comprising professionals with strong domain knowledge and extensive experience in the mortgage business. Weaknesses: * Moderate capitalisation PNB Housing last raised equity capital of around Rs 3000 crores in fiscal 2017 during the IPO, post which the CRISIL-adjusted gearing (including securitisation) improved to 6.9 times as on March 31, 2017 from 12.4 times as on March 31, 2016 (on-book gearing of 6.4 times and 12.2 times respectively). However, since then, with the rapid growth in portfolio, the CRISIL-adjusted gearing of the company increased to 11.0 times (on-book gearing of 9.6 times) as on March 31, 2019, from 9.4 times (on-book gearing of 8.6 times) as on March 31, 2018. Further, the capital adequacy metrics too have moderated with Tier 1 and overall capital adequacy ratio at around 11.0% and 13.98% respectively as on March 31, 2019 compared to 12.75% and 16.67% as on March 31, 2018. While the networth coverage for net non-performing assets remains adequate at 27 times as on March 31, 2019, adjusted gearing metrics (including securitization) have inched up beyond 10 times, making it imperative for the company to raise capital. While the company is cognizant of the same and is planning to raise equity in the current fiscal, the timing and quantum of the same and therefore the subsequent improvement in the gearing metrics is critical and a key monitorable. * Susceptibility to asset quality risks arising from the wholesale book Amidst the strong growth, the company's reported asset quality metrics have remained comfortable, with GNPA and 2 year lagged GNPA at 0.48% and 0.92%, respectively, as on March 31, 2019 (industry average: 1.4% and 2.1% respectively) compared to 0.33% and 0.68% as on March 31, 2018. Nevertheless, the concentration risk in the wholesale portfolio is high, with the top 20 group exposures constituting around 60% of the wholesale AUM as on March 31, 2019. Furthermore, some portion of the wholesale book is currently under moratorium with bullet or staggered repayments. While the company follows sound credit appraisal and risk management practices, has adequate collateral cover for its wholesale loans, and has also built strong recovery capabilities, asset quality in the past for the wholesale portfolio was also supported by an active refinance market, particularly for the real estate loans. PNB Housing has exposure to some stressed accounts, part of whom are in advanced stages of exits. Consequently, with the slowdown in the real estate sector and incipient stress for developers, ability to get timely refinance/exits and recover from some of these exposures and maintain asset quality metrics is a key monitorable. * Average, albeit improving, profitability PNB Housing has average, albeit improving, earnings profile. The return on total managed assets (RoMA; profit after tax by total assets + securitisation) stood at 1.46% for fiscal 2019 same as last year. Net interest margins (NIMs: interest income- interest expense by yearly average of total assets) at 2.2% for fiscal 2019 have decreased from 2.9% in fiscal 2018 amidst increasing competition in the housing finance segment and an increase in the cost of borrowings owing to the environment. However, improvement in NIMs going forward would hinge upon the company's ability to lower its cost of funds as it reduces the share of wholesale portfolio leading to a higher share of the low yielding retail asset classes. Nevertheless, over the past five fiscals, operating costs for PNB Housing have remained high owing to investments in infrastructure, systems and processes and people to support its strong growth plans, and increase in provisions (mainly for standard assets) and maintenance of excess liquidity to overcome with current challenging volatile market. With the new branches and investments in technology achieving scale, the same is expected to improve which would support the earnings profile. On the other hand, credit costs, have been low till date, even including the additional voluntary provisions made by the company. However, given the susceptibility of asset quality to potential slippages in the developer portfolio, credit costs could spike. Therefore, the ability of the company to manage asset quality going ahead specifically in the wholesale segment, will be a key determinant of profitability going ahead. |