Validating CECL Models for Wholesale CRE and C&I Portfolios

Client: US Bank

 

Objective

 

To validate the Probability of Default (PD) and Loss Given Default (LGD) models for wholesale CRE and C&I portfolios for the client.

 

CRISIL's Solution

 

  • Project Parameters: Wholesale CRE Portfolio
    • Validation based on M-factor approach (historical transition matrix) using linear regression for PD model, and linear regression for LGD model. This includes the following steps:
      • Quantitative validation of the OLS regression model
      • Development of the challenger model using alternate approach/information
    • The OLS model to estimate the PD and LGD  for CRE portfolio is:
      • M-factor = β0+ β1 * Mfactor_1Lag + β2 *Real_GDP_Growth+ + β3 * BBB_Corporate_yield + β4 *Japan_Inflation; PD =∅((𝜙^(−1) (𝑃𝑇)  + 𝑀𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟∗(−√𝜌))/(√(1−𝜌)))
      • LGD = β0+ β1 * Real_GDP_Growth_2Lag + β2 * BBB_Corporate_yield_4Lag
  • Project Parameters: Wholesale C&I Portfolio
    • Validation based on M-factor approach (historical transition matrix) using linear regression for PD model, and linear regression for LGD model. This includes the following steps:
      • Quantitative validation of the OLS regression model
      • Development of the challenger model using alternate approach/information
    • The OLS model to estimate the PD and LGD for C&I portfolio is:
      • M-factor = β0+ β1 * Mfactor_1Lag + β2 *Unemployment_rate_2Lag; PD =∅((𝜙^(−1) (𝑃𝑇)  + 𝑀𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟∗(−√𝜌))/(√(1−𝜌)))
      • LGD = β0+ β1 * UK_Bilateral_dollar_ExchangeRate_1Diff + β2 *Developing_Asia_Bilateral_dollar_ExchangeRate_1Diff
  • Data Quality & Audit
    • Replicated development dataset from raw files available in the general ledgers
    • Validation of data cleansing and preparation steps (e.g., validating imputation and transformation of data)
    • Routine checks in verifying the inclusion of data corresponding to full economic cycle, data relevancy
    • Validated the macroeconomic variables data from the internal repository which gets updated frequently
  • Validation of Key Aspects
    • Alternative approaches like contractual term, weighted average method using default/prepayment used to estimate the life of loan
    • Current default definition tested against the regulatory definition, underlying assumptions and role of senior management
    • Forecast horizon and macro-economic model forecast of reasonable and supportable forecast validated
  • Selection of Initial Pool of Variables
    • Variable selection process used in model development document and multi-collinearity validated
    • Assigned different significance levels for different variables and options to filter models with user-specified signs for different variables
  • Model Replication & Challenger Models
    • Replicated the entire variable selection process using information provided in the model development document
    • Verified the model coefficients along with the significance of the variables and verified the economic intuition of the sign of the variables chosen
    • Developed the challenger model using alternative approach/different variable
  • Independent Testing
    • Performed Model Fitting Tests, Coefficient Stability Analysis, Assumption Testing, Seasonality Check, Accuracy Tests of Model, Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
    • Performed back-testing analysis between actual and predicted PDs and LGDs

Client Impact

 

Validation project completed on time and on budget for both portfolios.

Questions

 

Looking for high-end research and risk services? Reach out to us at:

 

United States
1-855-595-2100/
+1 646 292 3520

 

United Kingdom
+44 (0) 870 333 6336

India
+91 22 33 42 3000 /
+91 22 61 72 3000